Bibliograph

What Roe v. Wade should have said, the nation's top legal experts rewrite America's most controversial decision, edited with an introduction by Jack M. Balkin

Type

Label

What Roe v. Wade should have said, the nation's top legal experts rewrite America's most controversial decision, edited with an introduction by Jack M. Balkin

Language

eng

Bibliography note

Includes bibliographical references (p. 267-273) and index

Illustrations

illustrations

Index

index present

Literary Form

non fiction

Main title

What Roe v. Wade should have said

Nature of contents

bibliography

Oclc number

47339957319728

Responsibility statement

edited with an introduction by Jack M. Balkin

Sub title

the nation's top legal experts rewrite America's most controversial decision

Table Of Contents

Part I. Introduction. Roe v. Wade: an engine of controversy / Jack M. Balkin -- Part II. Revised opinions in Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton. Jack M. Balkin (judgment of the Court) -- Reva Siegel (concurring) -- Mark Tushnet (concurring) -- Anita Allen (concurring in the judgment) -- Jed Rubenfeld (concurring in the judgment except as to Doe) -- Robin West (concurring in the judgment) -- Cass Sunstein (concurring in the judgment) -- Akhil Amar (concurring in Roe, dissenting in Doe) -- Jeffrey Rosen (dissenting) -- Teresa Stanton Collett (dissenting) --Michael Stokes Paulsen (dissenting) -- Photo appendix to the opinion of Michael Stokes Paulsen -- Comments from the contributors -- Appendix: The constitution of the United States of America: selected provisions

resource.variantTitle

What Roe versus Wade should have said

Classification